pdpublishers.com

Online Manuscript Submission

Authors are encouraged to submit their manuscripts electronically via the journal’s Online Journal System (OJS) for evaluation, tracking, and management of manuscripts, ensuring an efficient process from submission through to acceptance and final publication.

This website provides authors with step-by-step guidance throughout the submission process. Authors are required to upload the text, tables, and artwork in electronic format via OJS. If electronic submission is not possible or if other challenges arise, authors must contact the editorial office at info@pdpublishers.com to explore alternative arrangements. Submissions that do not comply with these guidelines will regrettably be excluded from consideration.

Manuscripts must be submitted by one of the authors, not by a third party. The corresponding author must provide a copyright letter on behalf of all co-authors (if applicable) when submitting the manuscript. The authors must certify that the manuscript, in whole or in part, has not been published previously and is not under review elsewhere. Additionally, any previously published illustrations, structures, or tables must be clearly indicated, and appropriate copyright permissions for reproduction must be obtained.

Flexible Submission Format

Authors’ time is valuable and should not be spent on intricate formatting tasks. The Free Format Submission policy streamlines the submission process, making it quicker and more convenient to prepare manuscripts.

When submitting to any PDP journal, authors are not required to adhere to strict formatting guidelines. Once an article is accepted for publication, it can be submitted in any preferred format, and PDP will handle its conversion to the journal’s specific style.

For accepted submissions, PDP will ensure that the manuscript is formatted according to the journal’s established standards.

For all online submissions, please provide soft copies of the following materials: the main text in MS Word or TeX/LaTeX, figures and illustrations in TIFF, PDF, or JPEG, and chemical structures in ChemDraw (CDX) or ISISDraw (TGF) as separate files. Additionally, a PDF version of the complete manuscript, including all figures, tables, and chemical structures, should be provided. It is recommended that all document files include the corresponding author’s name in the file name, such as “Cilli_MS_text.doc” or “Cilli_MS_Figure1.”

Before submission, it is essential for authors to thoroughly proofread the files to ensure that special characters, mathematical symbols, Greek letters, equations, tables, references, and images are properly formatted and displayed.

References, figures, tables, chemical structures, and similar elements must be cited within the text at the point where they are initially discussed. Additionally, figure legends or captions should be included.

Upon successful electronic submission of a manuscript, system-generated acknowledgements will be sent to the principal or corresponding author. Any related inquiries should be directed to info@pdpublishers.com

Note: For any further questions, please contact info@pdpublishers.com

Copyright and Licensing Policy

Authors publishing in our journals retain the copyright to their work. As a condition of publication, all submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under review elsewhere. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited, and by submitting their work, authors grant the publisher the legal authority to take appropriate action if any instance of plagiarism or data fabrication is detected. Once a manuscript is submitted, authors may not withdraw it at any point before publication.

Open Access articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License  (CC-BY4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode, which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any format, provided the original work is properly credited. This licensing framework ensures that authors retain the copyright to their work while enabling broad dissemination.

Copyright Letter

A signed copyright letter must be provided by the corresponding author when submitting the manuscript. The manuscript should not include any content that is unlawful, defamatory, fabricated, plagiarised, or in violation of the terms outlined in the copyright agreement. The authors understand that the publisher reserves the right to take legal action in the event of any breach of these terms. The copyright letter is available for download on the journal’s website. Download the copyright letter.

Permission for Reproduction

No published or reproduced material should be included unless written permission from the copyright holder has been secured. This permission must be submitted to the Editorial Office if the article is accepted for publication.

To reproduce any material from articles published by PDP, complete the required FORM and send it to info@pdpublishers.com for review.

Permissions for Third-Party Content

Authors bear the responsibility for managing the inclusion of third-party materials in their work as authors or editors. “Third-party content” refers to any material sourced from others, including text, figures, photographs, tables, screenshots, or similar items that have been copied or adapted.

Unless the content is in the public domain or available under Creative Commons or similar open licenses, authors must obtain permission from the copyright holder(s).

No published or reproduced material should be included without securing written permission, which must be submitted to the Editorial Office if the article is accepted for publication.

Article Processing Charges (APC)

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for each general article, whether it is a research paper, review, or case study, is set at USD 300

For articles published within thematic issues, the APC is reduced to USD 150.

Upon acceptance of the manuscript, an electronic invoice will be sent to the author via email.

Special Fee Waivers and Discounts

Precision Digital Publishers provides a 50% discount on the publication fee for corresponding authors residing in countries classified as low-income economies by the World Bank.

Refund Policy

Requests for fee waivers or discounts must be submitted during the initial article submission, not after acceptance. The payment process is separate from the editorial process and does not affect editorial decisions. Payment is required only after acceptance, and no article will be published until payment is received Precision Digital Publishers does not offer refunds once the publication fee has been paid.

Submission Guidelines

Authors are encouraged to review the following essential points before submitting their manuscript for evaluation. For detailed instructions, please consult the journal’s guide for authors.

  • The abstract must not contain any references.
  • References should be cited in numerical order within the text and must be included in the reference section.
  • Figures, schemes, and tables must be accompanied by appropriate captions.
  • Ensure that tables and figures are cited in the text in sequential numerical order.
  • Each table should be submitted separately in an editable Word document with corresponding captions.
  • Manuscripts with language errors will not be accepted. Authors are advised to seek professional editing for grammar, scientific accuracy, and typographical corrections before submitting the revised manuscript.
  • Chemical structures must be created using ChemDraw or CDX format.
  • For studies involving human or animal subjects, ethical approval is required. Please provide the name of the approving institution or committee along with the reference number.
  • Acknowledge the source of funding for the research or manuscript preparation.
  • Clearly state any financial contributions and disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Manuscript Publication

The journal welcomes the submission of original research articles, review articles, and letters written in English. Proposals for single-topic or thematic issues may also be considered for publication.

Conference Proceedings

For inquiries regarding the publication of conference proceedings in this journal, please reach out via email at info@pdpublishers.com

Supplement/Single Topic Issues

The journal also invites the submission of Supplements or Single-topic issues for publication. These issues will consist of a collection of review or research articles (ranging from 10 to 12 articles) centred around a current and significant theme or topic within the field. Mini-supplements, with 3 to 5 articles, are also encouraged. Guest Editors are responsible for inviting contributors to the supplement and overseeing the peer review process for submitted manuscripts. A brief summary or proposal for editing a supplement should be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief at info@pdpublishers.com

Manuscript Length

Research Articles

Research articles should be 4,000 to 6,000 words in length and must include a minimum of 75 references. This word count excludes figures, diagrams, images, tables, schemes, and comparable components.

Review Articles

A comprehensive review article typically spans from 6000 to 10000 words, with a minimum of 100 references, excluding figures, structures, photographs, schemes, tables, and other visual content.

Systematic Reviews

Systematic reviews involve updates to review protocols, methods, research, and findings from all relevant fields, as well as updates to previously published issues. These reviews should be between 4000 and 6000 words, incorporating at least 100 references, excluding figures, structures, photographs, schemes, tables, and similar elements. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses must follow PRISMA guidelines (www.prisma-statement.org).

Mini-Review Articles

Mini-reviews should be between 3000 and 6000 words, with a minimum of 75 references, not including figures, structures, photographs, schemes, tables, and related content.

Letter Articles

Letter articles should be between 3000 and 4000 words, including at least 40 references, excluding figures, structures, photographs, schemes, tables, and other visual elements.

Randomised Drug Clinical Trial Studies

Trial studies should range from 4000 to 6000 words, including a minimum of 50 references, not counting figures, diagrams, photographs, schemes, tables, and other similar elements.

Book Reviews

This journal publishes open-access reviews of recently released books, both print and digital, that are relevant to the journal’s focus. Book reviews should be between 850 and 1000 words, excluding figures, diagrams, photographs, schemes, tables, and similar content. Publishers and authors wishing to submit books for review can contact our book review editor at info@pdpublishers.com.  All books will be reviewed by an independent expert in the field. There are no page charges for publishing book reviews.

Case Reports

Case reports should detail new findings or unique outcomes that contribute to the field. The word count for a case report is between 1500 and 2500 words, with at least 40 references, excluding figures, diagrams, photographs, schemes, tables, and similar items.

Current Frontiers

Articles for this section should be contributed by leading experts on recent advancements. They should be formatted as mini-reviews, approximately 4 to 5 pages long (around 800 to 850 words per page), with about 70 references to recent literature. All pages must be numbered sequentially.

Editorials

Editorials are concise articles addressing significant topics pertinent to the journal. The word count for an editorial should be between 1000 and 1500 words and should include no more than 10-15 references. An abstract is not necessary.

Commentaries

Commentaries offer an analysis by scientists on various key issues related to the journal’s publications. The length of commentaries should be under 3000 words, encompassing the abstract, main text, references, and figure legends. However, an abstract is optional.

Perspectives

A perspective offers a concise overview of a research topic pertinent to the field. It generally spans between 1500 and 1800 words and cites a minimum of 20 references, not counting any figures, structures, photographs, schemes, tables, or similar elements.

Industry News

Industry News highlights important developments in industries related to the journal’s scope that are of interest to the readership. The submission should be approximately 1000 words and ideally include 10 or more references. An abstract is not required.

Patent News

Patent News may provide significant updates on recently granted patents that are relevant to the journal’s focus. The article should span around 1000 words and incorporate a minimum of 10 references. An abstract is not necessary.

There are no limitations on the number of figures, tables, or supplementary materials such as video clips, animations, and datasets that can be included in the online version of each article.

Manuscript Preparation

The manuscript must be composed in clear, concise, and active English. All pages must be numbered sequentially to facilitate the review and editing process.

Microsoft Word Template

Authors are encouraged to use the available template when preparing their manuscript, as it will ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal’s formatting requirements.

Manuscript Structure for Submissions

Manuscripts submitted to the journal for research or review articles must be structured according to the following sections:

  • Title
  • Title page
  • Structured Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Organization of the main text
  • Conclusion
  • List of abbreviations (if applicable)
  • Consent for Publication
  • Availability of Data and Materials
  • Funding
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendices
  • Figures/Illustrations (if applicable)
  • Chemical Structures (if applicable)
  • Tables and Captions (if applicable)
  • Supporting/Supplementary Materials (if applicable)

Title

The title must be clear, concise, and restricted to a maximum of 120 characters. Authors should avoid using non-standard abbreviations or question marks in the title. It should follow title case formatting, excluding articles, conjunctions, and prepositions.

In line with reporting guidelines, the title should convey essential study details, particularly for randomized or clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

A brief “running title” must also be included. The title, running title, author byline, corresponding author footnote, and keywords must align with the original manuscript.

Title Page

The title page should present the full title of the paper, the authors’ names and affiliations, as well as the complete contact information—address, phone, fax, and email—of the corresponding author(s).

Structured Abstract

The abstract must provide a clear, concise, and precise summary, limited to a maximum of 250 words, and should include clearly defined subheadings in bold, either incorporated within the text or as standalone headings. The use of abbreviations should be minimized, and references should not be cited within the abstract.

Structured abstracts are required for original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Ideally, each abstract should have the following subheadings, although these may vary based on the article’s requirements.

  • Introduction/Objectives: Present a concise summary of the study’s purpose, highlighting its primary aims and objectives in a few sentences.
  • Methods: Offer a brief overview of the research design, including the methodology, participant details, and any essential aspects of how the study was conducted.
  • Results: Summarize the key findings, emphasizing significant outcomes and, where applicable, any relevant statistical data or noteworthy observations.
  • Conclusion: Provide a comprehensive summary of the study’s main conclusions, including the broader implications or potential applications of the findings.

The section headings should clearly convey the study’s objectives, participant information, measurements used, methods employed, major findings, and overall conclusion.

Keywords

When selecting keywords, ensure they are relevant and significant, ideally between 6 to 8 terms. These keywords should be carefully chosen to help researchers in the field easily locate your paper, enhancing its visibility in database searches. Incorporate these terms into the title and repeat them throughout the article for optimal indexing. In biomedical research, MeSH terms serve as an excellent standardized vocabulary for identifying appropriate keywords from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html.

Text Organization

The primary text must begin on a separate page and should include the title page, main content, and main content. It may be further divided based on the specific topics covered, followed by sections such as the List of Abbreviations (if applicable), Conflict of Interest, Acknowledgements, and References. For review manuscripts, the structure should consist of a title page, abstract, and main text, with subdivisions based on the subjects discussed, followed by Acknowledgements and References. Review Articles should reference significant recent and earlier reviews in the field, offering a thorough discussion that begins with a general overview of the subject. It should then highlight key aspects of recent advancements. Authors are advised not to include previously published data or material from earlier reviews and should succinctly present and discuss their findings.

For research articles, the manuscript should start with a title page and abstract, followed by the main text organized into distinct sections: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgements, Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate, Conflict of Interest, Human and Animal Rights, and References.

All randomized clinical trials must include a flow diagram, and authors are required to provide a complete randomized trial checklist (refer to the CONSORT Flow Diagram and Checklist at www.consort-statement.org) along with a trial protocol. For more information, please consult the comprehensive guidelines at http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html.

For case reports, authors should adhere to the CARE guidelines, submitting the CARE checklist as a separate document.

The manuscript must maintain consistent formatting throughout, using 10-point Times New Roman font. Abbreviations should be spelt out at their first mention unless they represent standard units of measurement. References should be cited using square brackets. Binomial names of organisms (Genus and Species) must be italicized, as should unfambeniliar terms, words for emphasis, and non-assimilated Latin or foreign phrases (e.g., per se, et al.).

Section Titles

Section titles must be numbered in order, aligned to the left, and begin with a capital letter, starting from the introduction. Sub-section titles, on the other hand, should be written in lowercase, italicized, with only the initial letters capitalized. They should follow a numbering format such as 1.1, 1.2, and so on.

Introduction

The introduction should provide a thorough overview of the research background and clearly outline its objectives.

Materials and Methods

This section outlines the methodology employed, including references to prior efforts where relevant. It should also address potential modifications and areas for future research. Comprehensive details about the original data source must be provided to ensure readers can assess the analysis, appropriateness, and validity of the reported findings.

The Methods section must thoroughly describe the data presented and the results derived. All protocols and information gathered during the study’s development should be included. If the research received financial support or funding from an organization, this must be disclosed. Additionally, methods should be focused on achieving specific outcomes. Any statements regarding approval from independent review committees (such as ethics committees or institutional review boards) should also be included in this section.

Clear Disclosure of AI and AI-Assisted Technologies

Authors utilizing AI tools for generating images, graphical elements, or for data collection and analysis must clearly disclose their use in the Materials and Methods section (or equivalent) of the manuscript. They should specify the AI tool used and explain how it contributed to the research.

Authors remain entirely responsible for the content of their manuscripts, including sections created with AI assistance, and are accountable for any violations of publication ethics.

Precision Digital Publishers will review whether the disclosed use of AI aligns with its established principles and guidelines. After publication, content may be revised or rejected if the AI usage was improperly declared or if circumstances warrant such action.

Experimental Section

Repeated information should be avoided in the article’s text. The calculation section should present experimental data, factual details, and practical insights from a theoretical standpoint.

Results Section

The Results section should prioritize the study’s key findings. Tables, figures, and references should be presented in a logical sequence to highlight critical information or observations. Data repetition across tables and figures should be minimized. All results must be presented accurately and concisely.

Discussion

This section should analyze the significance of the study’s findings, outline a reproducible methodology, and underscore the article’s relevance in the context of recent advancements in the field. Avoid extensive citations or an in-depth review of existing literature.

The discussion should address the implications of the results, consider them in relation to current research, and acknowledge the study’s limitations. The authors must justify the sample size based on the study’s objectives and chosen methods.

The “Results and Discussion” may be combined under a single heading or divided into separate sections (“Results” and “Discussion”). If needed, brief sub-headings can be included within each section.

Conclusion

The conclusion should briefly summarize the article’s main content, present the final research outcomes, or suggest directions for future studies. This section should be concise and placed at the end of the article.

Funding

Authors must explicitly disclose the funding sources for their manuscripts by stating the name of the funding agency or financial support provider, including the associated grant or award number in parentheses, if applicable. For example “This study received financial support from [Funding Agency] under Grant No. XXX.”

If the manuscript is not supported by any specific funding source and is instead part of the author’s employment, the employer’s name must be provided. Additionally, authors must indicate whether the funder participated in the editing approval, writing, or decision to publish the manuscript.

Greek Symbols and Special Characters

Greek symbols and special characters may be altered or omitted during the manuscript preparation process for publication. To prevent this, authors must ensure that these symbols are properly embedded in the text as symbols and not inserted through formatting styles (such as the Symbol font face), as they may not survive conversion to PDF/XML.

Reporting Guidelines

Authors are encouraged to follow reporting guidelines that offer recommendations relevant to their research design. All measurements must be presented in the International System of Units (SI). Chemical equations, chemical names, mathematical expressions, units of measurement, and chemical or physical quantities should adhere to SI standards and conform to Chemical Abstracts or IUPAC conventions.

List of Abbreviations

If abbreviations are used, they should either be defined when first mentioned in the text or compiled in a separate list of abbreviations for clarity.

Systematic Review Registration

PDP endorses the retrospective registration of systematic reviews in appropriate registries, such as PROSPERO. The registration number must be included as the final line in the manuscript’s abstract.

Appendices

If detailed methodological information is necessary, appendices may be used as part of the article. Each appendix should be no more than three pages, using Times New Roman, 10-point font, with a maximum of 900 words per page. Information should be concise, avoiding full sentences. A single appendix should be labelled “APPENDIX,” while multiple appendices should be labelled “APPENDIX A,” “APPENDIX B,” and so forth.

Supplementary Material

Authors are encouraged to submit supplementary material, such as PowerPoint presentations, screenshots, original instruments (Word, RTF, PDF), videos, or data files (SAS/SPSS, Excel, Access), provided it is essential or approved by the journal’s Editor.

Reproduced material must have written permission from the copyright holder, which should be sent to the Editorial Office upon acceptance.

Supplementary material intended for publication must be cited in the manuscript and listed under a separate section titled “Supportive/Supplementary Material” before the “References” section. Each item should include a brief description. These materials will be linked to the published article but will not appear within the paper and will be available on the journal’s website in their original form.

All supplementary files should be provided as a single zipped file, not exceeding 4 MB. Each file must contain only one table, figure, or video (linked files or large PDFs are not permitted). Authors must specify if supplementary files are solely for reviewers’ or editors’ reference and not for publication.

Research Ethics and Policies

Conflict of Interest

Authors

Authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest (competing interests) that may directly or indirectly impact their work. Even if no conflicts exist, sharing affiliations and interests fosters transparency and promotes a more thorough, unbiased evaluation. Readers have the right to be informed of both actual and perceived conflicts.

All submitted papers must include a conflict-of-interest statement within the article and a completed disclosure form. Financial relationships, such as research funding or consulting support, are not inherently inappropriate. Authors with no conflicts must still include a confirmation statement in their manuscript, such as: “The author(s) confirm(s) that there is no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.”

Below are examples of possible conflicts of interest related to the research:

Financial competing interests encompass, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Type of support/grant number
  • Institutional conflicts of interest
  • Funds received by the author
  • Funds received by the institution
  • Travel allowances for research
  • Funds allocated for article preparation and review
  • Funds designated for conducting review activities
  • Support for article writing assistance, including drugs, equipment, etc.
  • Paid lectures
  • Pending funds or grants

Financial conflicts of interest can arise both personally and institutionally. A personal conflict occurs when an individual involved in the publication process receives or anticipates receiving financial compensation (including benefits such as patents, stocks, gifts, or services) that may influence the work related to a specific publication. More significantly, in academic research, such financial relationships can create institutional conflicts of interest (COIs), where the financial interests of the institution or its representatives may unduly impact the decision-making process.

An institutional conflict of interest arises when the financial interests of an institution or its representatives (such as the university’s investments in a company) have the potential to improperly influence the research conducted by its faculty, staff, or students, or pose an unacceptable risk to human participants. These conflicts typically arise when a research project provides assistance or benefits to an external entity through the evaluation, validation, trial, or testing of an invention, product, drug, service, or technology, and the institution has a financial stake in the external entity. Such financial interests include but are not limited to, receiving licensing payments, royalties, or owning shares in the external entity. When human subjects are involved, and the institution supports such financial interests, the conflict of interest is considered unreasonable.

Non-financial competing interests encompass, but are not limited to, the following

Additionally, any non-financial interests, including but not restricted to personal relationships, conflicts of interest, or professional opinions that could potentially influence the research, should be disclosed if relevant to the readers. These could include direct or indirect ties to the research or other interests impacting the research process.

Intellectual property refers to intangible assets resulting from creative efforts, such as patents, copyrights, and similar creations. This section aims to gather information on intellectual property, including patents (whether licensed, pending, or issued), as well as any financial compensation received for such assets, such as:

  • Patent
  • Licensed Patent
  • Issued Patent
  • Pending Patent
  • Royalties
  • Licensee
  • Remarks

Disclosure Statement

All conflict-of-interest disclosure forms are to be submitted by the corresponding author. In cases of author collaborations, it is acceptable for the corresponding author to sign the disclosure form on behalf of all co-authors, provided that legal agreements permit such representation. Templates for the form are available here:

Prior to the reference list, the corresponding author will include a brief statement in the article text that summarizes the content of the conflict of interest disclosure form(s). Authors may identify potential conflicts of interest related to reviewers, enabling the Editorial Office to avoid inviting those individuals to review in order to maintain an unbiased evaluation.

Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest

Cases of undisclosed conflicts of interest, whether prior to or after the publication of an article, will be addressed in accordance with COPE guidelines:

  • Unreported conflict of interest in a submitted manuscript (View COPE guidelines)
  • Unrevealed conflict of interest in a published manuscript View COPE guidelines)
  • For additional information on conflicts of interest, refer to the ICMJE guidance.

 

Peer Reviewers

PDP is committed to maintaining a transparent peer-review process by involving reviewers who are free from any conflicts of interest with the authors. To maintain impartiality, reviewers from the same institution or country as the authors are not invited to evaluate manuscripts. However, the Editorial Office cannot always be aware of all potential conflicts of interest. Therefore, authors are expected to submit:

  • A list of reviewers they believe may have a conflict of interest, to facilitate a fair and unbiased review process.

The Editorial Office expects reviewers to:

  • Kindly decline manuscript review requests if a potential conflict of interest exists and promptly notify the Editorial Office of the situation.
  • Refuse review requests if they have recently published or submitted a paper with any of the authors listed in the manuscript.
  • Inform the Editorial Office if they have any personal relationship with the authors or work at the same institution as the authors, which could compromise the review’s transparency.
  • Please avoid reporting or submitting any instances of scientific misconduct, fraud, plagiarism, conflicts of interest, or other unethical practices associated with the manuscript to the Editorial Office, Editor-in-Chief, or Handling Editors.

When submitting review comments, reviewers are required to reaffirm that they have no conflicts of interest related to the article. Once they have confirmed the following statement, they may proceed with submitting their comments:

“I hereby confirm that I have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.”

If any conflicts of interest still exist, reviewers must disclose them in the ‘Confidential’ section of the review form.

Reviewers are discouraged from directly contacting authors about any conflicts of interest. Peer reviewers should adhere to the journal’s policies in situations they deem to present a conflict.

Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest

If reviewers deliberately fail to disclose a conflict of interest, they will be blacklisted from participating in future peer-review activities for the journal.

The editorial office ensures that any author added after the peer review process has been completed is not included in the list of reviewers who evaluated the same manuscript.

Editors

Editors should refrain from reviewing submitted manuscripts if they have any personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest with the authors. All individuals involved in the peer review process, including editorial board members, reviewers, and editors, must disclose any potential conflicts of interest to maintain transparency and ensure an impartial review.

Editors-in-chief or editors responsible for making initial and final decisions should avoid reviewing or making decisions on manuscripts authored by individuals affiliated with the same institution as the editor, or those who are family members, competitors, collaborators, or have co-authored with the manuscript’s authors within the past three years. In such cases, they may appoint another board member to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript.

The editorial office advises editors to adhere to COPE and WAME guidelines when handling manuscripts with personal connections.

Manuscript Submission by an Editor/Editor-in-Chief

The first and final decisions regarding manuscripts submitted by an Editor or Editor-in-Chief will be made by another member of the board. The Editorial Office will designate board members who do not have any potential conflicts of interest with the Editor or Editor-in-Chief.

Acknowledgements

Any individuals who contributed to the research but are not listed as authors, such as those involved in the literature review, data production, computerisation, and analysis, or those who assisted with language, writing, or proofreading, or provided feedback or suggestions, should be recognised. In short, any person who made a significant contribution to the improvement of the manuscript should be acknowledged. If the author chooses not to acknowledge anyone, it is advised to state “Declared none” in the acknowledgement section.

Guest or honorary authorship granted solely based on position (e.g., research supervisor, department head) is discouraged.

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org) has established specific criteria for authorship. Examples of authors’ contributions include: ‘designed the research/study’, ‘performed the research/study’, ‘provided key reagents’, ‘collected data’, ‘analyzed data’, ‘wrote the manuscript’, etc. This information must be included as a separate paragraph in the manuscript under the heading ‘Authors’ Contribution’. The corresponding author is responsible for securing consent from all co-authors for manuscript submission and for making any necessary changes to the authorship list.

Human and Animal Rights

Research Involving Humans

All clinical research must adhere to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Manuscripts reporting data from studies involving human participants must obtain formal review and approval from a relevant institutional review board or ethics committee.

Patient Consent

Adherence to the guidelines established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/protection-of-research-participants.html is advised, in alignment with the patient’s consent for research or study participation. This adherence must comply with relevant laws and regulations governing the privacy and security of personal information, including but not limited to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), other applicable U.S. federal and state confidentiality laws, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (EU) 2016/679 and related national legislation, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act of Canada, as well as the Information Technology Act of India and its associated Privacy Rules (collectively referred to as “Data Protection and Privacy Laws”).

Additionally, the author bears the responsibility to ensure that:

  • The manuscript does not include patients’ names, initials, or hospital identification numbers in any section, including figures.
  • Authors are required to secure consent-to-disclose forms from all identifiable patients featured in photographs, videos, or other materials that may be published in the journal, its derivative works, or on the journal’s website. Additionally, the manuscript must be shared with the identifiable patient for review prior to submission.
  • The consent-to-disclose form must specify the intended use, including publication in both print and online medical literature, with the understanding that it will be accessible to both patients and the public. It must also bear the patient’s signature, or that of a legal guardian, accompanied by a declaration that the patient or guardian was given the opportunity to review the identifying materials and the manuscript.
  • When a manuscript contains an individual’s data, such as personal information or audio-visual content, consent must be secured from the individual. For minors, consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian.
  • A formal declaration of this approval, including a consent-to-disclose statement, must be included in the copyright letter and as a distinct paragraph at the end of the article. This is particularly crucial for human studies, where it is imperative to affirm that written informed consent has been obtained from each participant or their guardian. The original consent form should be maintained by the guarantor or corresponding author. Editors may, however, request these forms via fax or email if necessary.
  • Proper consent must be acquired before publication in all such instances. Please consult the COPE guidelines available at https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/journals%E2%80%99-best-practices-ensuring-consent-publishing-medical-case-reports

Editors may request authors to submit evidence of formal review and approval from the relevant institutional review board or ethics committee overseeing the study. Furthermore, the editors retain the authority to reject any manuscripts that fail to meet these specified requirements, with authors being fully responsible for any false declarations or non-compliance.

Non-identifiable Images

Images that do not directly or indirectly reveal an individual’s identity—such as X-rays, ultrasound scans, pathology slides, or laparoscopic images—do not necessitate formal consent.

However, if consent has not been obtained, masking the identity through techniques like eye bars or facial blurring will not be considered acceptable.

Animal Research Guidelines

Researchers conducting studies involving animals are required to confirm adherence to the guidelines set forth in the eighth edition of the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals_prepub.pdf. published by the National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.).

Additionally, all animal studies should adhere to the NC3Rs ARRIVE Guidelines. For in vivo experiments, refer to the website https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines.

Authors must explicitly mention the approval committee’s name, confirming that both legal and ethical approvals were secured prior to commencing the research on animals. Furthermore, the experiments must be conducted in strict accordance with the applicable guidelines and regulations outlined below.

Ethics Approval Exemption

In cases where a study is exempt from ethics approval, authors are required to provide a clear justification for the exemption within the ethical statement.

An example of an ethical statement is as follows:

“This research involving animal subjects received an exemption from ethics approval due to [specific reasons]. The exemption was reviewed and approved by [Full name of ethics committee], ensuring full compliance with established ethical guidelines.”

Client-Owned Animals

Animals owned by clients (including pets or livestock not intended for commercial use) must be studied in adherence to the highest standards of veterinary care. Authors are required to confirm that written consent has been obtained from the owner(s) or their legal representatives for the study’s purposes.

Example of an Ethical Statement regarding client-owned animals

“The animal study received evaluation and approval from [Full name of the ethics committee]. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners, guaranteeing ethical treatment and compliance with established guidelines.”

International Standards and the 3Rs Principle

Research involving animal subjects must conform to globally recognized standards and uphold the 3Rs principles—Replace, Reduce, and Refine.

  • Replace: Substitute animals with alternative methods wherever feasible.
  • Reduce: Minimize the number of animals used in experiments.
  • Refine: Enhance experimental procedures to mitigate potential harm to animals.

Researchers are strongly encouraged to adhere to the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) when documenting studies involving live animals.

Below is an example of an ethical statement that aligns with international standards and the 3Rs Principle:

“This research complies with internationally recognized standards for animal experimentation, adhering to the 3Rs principle. The ARRIVE guidelines were utilized to ensure ethical and comprehensive reporting of experiments involving live animals.”

Euthanasia Protocols

The use of euthanasia methods such as chloral hydrate, ether, or chloroform overdose is strongly discouraged. Authors are required to provide a detailed account of all surgical, anaesthetic, or euthanasia procedures performed during the research.

If any experimental procedures deviate from established animal research standards, editors may request additional documentation, including approval forms and pertinent literature references.

Research Involving Plants

All experimental research involving plants, whether domesticated or wild, must comply with recognized international standards. The manuscript should contain a declaration affirming that field studies adhere to the relevant guidelines and/or that the required permits or licenses have been secured, in accordance with the ICN Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of Extinction and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.

Hazard Study

Any potential risks related to the use of chemicals, procedures, or equipment involved in the research must be clearly outlined by the author in the manuscript. This should be done in both the materials and methods section and the declaration section. For further details, refer to The World Medical Association https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/public-health/chemicals.

The SAGER Guidelines (For Sex and Gender Equity in Research)

We are committed to advancing gender and sex equity in research by adhering to the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines, which ensure the inclusivity and rigor of our work. All authors submitting research papers are mandated to comply with the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines. These guidelines aim to foster the integration of sex and gender considerations in research, thereby enhancing the accuracy and relevance of our publications.

Additionally, the SAGER guidelines for reporting sex and gender information in methodology, study design, data analysis, results, and interpretation of findings are highly recommended. Authors of review articles are encouraged to address the methods used in selecting, locating, extracting, and synthesising data. Furthermore, systematic reviews must also adhere to these guidelines.

Research Conducted In Special Or Critical Situations

Precision Digital Publishers expects all contributors to uphold the principles of justice, benevolence, and autonomy in their research endeavours. We recognize that certain circumstances, such as medical emergencies or humanitarian crises, may present challenges distinct from those found in non-emergency settings. PDP recommends that research be conducted in a manner that does not harm human subjects or researchers, ensuring it maintains adequate scientific rigour within the constraints of the situation. Special care must be taken to address the challenges faced by individuals who may be victims of disasters or involved in medical emergencies, as these are vulnerable groups. Their privacy and dignity must be safeguarded at all times. Researchers should be vigilant in identifying and addressing any issues that may arise due to such circumstances. Research undertaken in emergency contexts should prioritise the well-being of survivors and aim to minimise the risk of further harm. The fundamental requirements for research in emergency situations include the preservation of life, well-being, and security, as well as the protection of subjects’ rights to privacy and confidentiality.

Unethical Conduct

Any individual may report instances of unethical conduct or misconduct to the editor or publisher, provided there is sufficient evidence. Upon receiving such a report, the editor, in collaboration with the publisher, is obligated to initiate a thorough investigation, ensure an impartial resolution, and uphold strict confidentiality throughout the process. The author must be granted the opportunity to respond to all allegations, whether minor or significant.

In cases of severe violations, the editor or publisher, after thoroughly reviewing all relevant evidence or consulting experts in the field when necessary, may inform the author as deemed appropriate.

Conclusion

  • Authors and reviewers must be promptly notified in cases of any misinterpretation or mishandling of established International Standards.
  • A formal warning should be issued to both the author and reviewer to prevent future instances of unethical conduct.
  • An editorial addressing the reported misconduct should be published, or an official notice of the unethical behaviour should be posted on the website.
  • Official correspondence regarding the misconduct should be sent to the relevant department heads, funding agencies of the implicated author, the reviewer, and abstracting and indexing agencies.
  • If necessary, the retraction or withdrawal of the publication should be coordinated with the author’s or reviewer’s department head, and all pertinent higher authorities should be informed.
  • The publisher may enforce a temporary restriction on the author’s ability to submit future publications to the journal.

Consent for Publication

When a manuscript includes personal data, such as identifiable information, audio-visual content, or similar materials, consent must be obtained from the individual involved. For children, this consent must be secured from a parent or legal guardian.

A formal declaration of this approval, including a consent-to-disclose statement, must be clearly indicated in the copyright letter and included as a separate paragraph at the article’s conclusion. This is particularly essential in studies involving human subjects, where obtaining written informed consent from each participant or their guardian is mandatory. The guarantor or corresponding author must retain the original consent form, and editors may request copies via fax or email when necessary.

Randomised Drug Clinical Trial Studies

Randomised drug clinical trials are health-focused or biomedical research studies, conducted in phases, involving human participants who are randomly assigned to receive or not receive a preventive, therapeutic, or diagnostic intervention according to a pre-established protocol. The primary objective of these studies is to assess the safety and effectiveness of methods used in disease diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

Authors conducting randomised controlled trials are encouraged to submit their trial protocols alongside their manuscripts. All clinical trials must be registered in a suitable public trial registry prior to enrolling the first participant. The registry must be independent of any commercial interests (e.g., www.clinicaltrials.gov)  If an editor is required to review an unregistered trial, a concise explanation for the lack of registration must be provided.

The following key considerations must be observed when submitting clinical trial manuscripts

  • Each manuscript must explicitly present a clear objective or hypothesis, the study design and methodology (including the setting, duration, participants with inclusion and exclusion criteria, or data sources, and their selection process), the key aspects of any interventions, primary outcome measures, main findings, a discussion contextualizing the results with existing literature while addressing limitations, and the conclusions. All data presented must be original.
  • The trial registry name, registration identification number, and registry URL must be provided both at the end of the abstract and in the designated section of the online submission form. For controlled healthcare intervention studies, the trial registry and unique identifying number must be listed, ensuring no spaces between letters and numbers. Studies focused on other objectives, such as pharmacokinetics or toxicity (e.g., phase 1 trials), are exempt from this requirement.
  • All reports on randomized trials must contain a section within the methods labelled “Randomization and Masking.”
  • The manuscript must include a declaration identifying the institutional and/or licensing committee that approved the experiments, along with relevant details.
  • The SI unit system and the Recommended International Non-Proprietary Name (rINN) for drugs must be used. Additionally, the dosage, route, and frequency of drug administration must be accurately detailed.
  • Clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies must adhere to good publication practice guidelines: (https://www.ismpp.org/about-us).

Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that fail to meet these requirements. Furthermore, the author assumes full responsibility for any inaccuracies or failure to comply with these stipulations.

References

References should ideally be submitted in ACS or Vancouver style, ensuring completeness and accuracy. Reference numbers must be finalized, and the bibliography fully formatted prior to submission.

References must be pertinent to the study and cite original research sources. Authors, editors, and peer reviewers should avoid self-citation and conflicts of interest.

Examples of references in ACS and Vancouver styles are provided below:

ACS Style

In the ACS style, references are numbered sequentially [within square brackets] in the text and listed in corresponding order in the reference section. Superscripts should not be used for in-text citations or in the reference list.

Reference Lists

Citation rules vary by reference format. Examples of commonly used formats include the following:

Journal Article Reference

The essential components for citing a journal article include the author’s name, abbreviated journal title, year of publication, volume number, and the starting page of the article, though full pagination may be provided. The journal abbreviation and volume number should appear in italics, while the publication year must be in bold. All authors must be listed individually, without using “et al.” Journal abbreviations should conform to the Index Medicus/MEDLINE guidelines.

Example 1: Bard, M.; Woods, R.A.; Bartón, D.H.; Corrie, J.E.; Widdowson, D.A. Sterol mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: chromatographic analyses. Lipids, 1977, 12(8), 645-654.

Example 2: Zhang, W.; Brombosz, S.M.; Mendoza, J.L.; Moore, J.S. A high-yield, one-step synthesis of o-phenylene ethynylene cyclic trimer via precipitation-driven alkyne metathesis. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 10198-10201.

Book Reference

Example 3: Crabtree, R.H. The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals, 3rd ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001.

Book Chapter Reference

Example 4: Wheeler, D.M.S.; Wheeler, M.M.D. “Stereoselective Syntheses of Doxorubicin and Related Compounds In, Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, 1994; Vol. 14, pp. 3-46.

Conference Proceedings

Example 5: Jakeman, D.L.; Withers, S.G.E. In “Carbohydrate Bioengineering: Interdisciplinary Approaches,” Proceedings of the 4th Carbohydrate Bioengineering Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden, June 10-13, 2001, Teeri, T.T.; Svensson, B.; Gilbert, H.J.; Feizi, T., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 3-8.

URL (WebPage)

Example 6: National Library of Medicine. Specialized Information Services: Toxicology and Environmental Health. (Accessed May 23, 2004).

Patent

Example 7: Hoch, J.A.; Huang, S. Screening Methods for the Identification of Novel Antibiotics. U.S. Patent 6,043,045, March 28, 2000.

Thesis

Example 8: Mackel, H. Capturing the Spectra of Silicon Solar Cells. PhD Thesis, The Australian National University: Canberra, December 2004.

E-citations

Example 9: Citations for articles or materials published exclusively online or in open access (free-to-view) must include the correct Web addresses (URLs) at the end of the reference(s), except for those posted on an author’s personal website, unless editorially relevant, e.g., ‘Reference: Available from: URL.’

Key points to note are as follows:

  • Citations must include all authors, and the use of the term “et al.” is prohibited.
  • The date of access should be included for online citations.
  • Punctuation should be applied correctly, as demonstrated in the examples provided.
  • Abstracts, unpublished data, and personal communications (which may only be included with prior consent) should not appear in the references section. These details may, however, be included in the footnotes.
  • Authors are encouraged to utilize a current version of EndNote (version 5 or higher) or Reference Manager (version 10) for formatting the reference list, as these tools enable automatic extraction of references.

Vancouver Style

In Vancouver style, references must be numbered consecutively using square brackets and listed in the same order within both the text and the reference section. Proper punctuation, as demonstrated in the examples provided, is essential.

Reference Lists

Citations adhere to distinct rules based on the type of source. Below are examples of common formats:

Journal Article

A journal article citation requires the author’s name, abbreviated journal title, publication year, volume number, and starting page of the article. Full pagination may also be included. If there are six or fewer authors, all should be listed; for more than six, list the first three authors followed by et al. (italicized). Journal abbreviations must align with Index Medicus/MEDLINE. Only the first word of the title should be capitalized, except for proper nouns, with all other words in lowercase.

  • [1] Al-Habian A, Harikumar PE, Stocker CJ, Langlands K, Selway JL. Histochemical and immunohistochemical evaluation of mouse skin histology: comparison of fixation with neutral buffered formalin and alcoholic formalin. J Histotechnol. 2014 Dec;37(4):115-24.
  • [2] Guilbert TW, Morgan WJ, Zeiger RS, et al. Long-term inhaled corticosteroids in preschool children at high risk for asthma. N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):1985-97.

Edited Book

  • [3] Blaxter PS, Farnsworth TP. Social health and class inequalities. In: Carter C, Peel JR, Eds. Equalities and inequalities in health. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press 1976; pp. 165-78.

Chapter in a Book

  • [4] Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, Eds. Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press 1995; pp. 465-78.

Patent

  • [5] Larsen CE, Trip R, Johnson CR. Methods for procedures related to the electrophysiology of the heart. US Patent 5529067, 1995.

Conference Proceedings

  • [6] Kimura J, Shibasaki H, Eds. Recent advances in clinical neurophysiology. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of EMG and Clinical Neurophysiology; 1995 Oct 15-19; Kyoto, Japan. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1996.

Thesis and Dissertation

  • [7] Borkowski MM. Infant sleep and feeding: a telephone survey of Hispanic Americans. PhD dissertation. Mount Pleasant (MI): Central Michigan University 2002.

URL(WebPage)

  • [8] Aylin P, Bottle A, Jarman B, Elliott, P. Paediatric cardiac surgical mortality in England after Bristol: descriptive analysis of hospital episode statistics 1991-2002. BMJ [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Oct 9; [cited: 15 October 2004]; 329: [about 10 screens].

Electronic Material

Journal Article in Electronic Format

  • [9] Frangioni G, Bianchi S, Fuzzi G, Borgioli G. Dynamics of hepatic melanogenesis in newts in recovery phase from hypoxia. Open Zoo J 2009; 2: 1-7. Available from: PDPopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOZJ-2-1 [cited: 26th Jan 2009]
  • [10] Abood S. Quality improvement initiative in nursing homes: the ANA acts in an advisory role. Am J Nurs [serial on the Internet]. June 2002 [cited: 12th Aug 2002]; 102(6): [about 3 p.]. Available from: www.nursingworld.org/ana/

Key considerations to keep in mind include the following:

  • Always provide the access date for online citations.
  • Avoid using superscripts in both in-text citations and the reference section.
  • Abstracts, unpublished data, and personal communications should not be listed in the references unless prior permission is obtained. Instead, such details may be included in the footnotes.
  • Authors are advised to use the latest versions of EndNote (version 5 or higher) or Reference Manager (version 10) to format their references, as these tools facilitate automatic reference extraction.

Availability of Data and Materials

The manuscript should clearly state the sources of data and materials used to support the research findings. Sharing research data is essential for ensuring transparency and reproducibility. Proper citation and availability of data play a critical role in supporting the research outcomes.

PDP strongly encourages authors to disclose the sources of data and materials within the manuscript to reinforce the validity of the findings.

Types of Research Data Policies

There are four categories of research data policies outlined below:

  • Case 1: Data Sharing and Data Citation
  • Case 2: Data Sharing and Supporting Evidence
  • Case 3: Statement on Data Sharing and Availability
  • Case 4: Data Sharing, Evidence of Data Sharing, and Data for Peer Review

Case 1: Data Sharing and Data Citation

The journal actively encourages authors to deposit their research data in public repositories whenever feasible. Any datasets referenced in the article and stored in external repositories must be appropriately cited.

Guidelines for Data Citation

All publicly accessible data, whether generated by the authors or other researchers, must be cited both within the text and in the reference list. Citations should follow this structured format:

Example Format

Author(s) name, title of the dataset, repository name, document version (e.g., most recent update), Digital Object Identifier (DOI), and PDP reference style.

Case 2: Data Sharing and Supporting Evidence

When submitting a manuscript to a journal, authors consent to make the data presented in the publication, including pertinent raw data, freely accessible to researchers for non-commercial purposes, provided that participant anonymity is preserved.

Case 3: Data Sharing and Availability Statement

In accordance with the PDP Research Data Policy, a declaration regarding data availability is mandatory. This statement should be included in a dedicated section titled “Availability of Data and Materials” within the manuscript and formatted accordingly.

  • The authors affirm that the data underpinning the findings of this study are included within the article and its supplementary materials.
  • The data supporting this study’s findings can be obtained from the corresponding author, [author initials], upon formal request.
  • The datasets produced or analyzed during the present study are not publicly accessible due to [state the reason(s)].
  • Authors who choose not to share their data should explicitly indicate this by stating, “Not applicable.”
  • The data statement should adhere to the following format:


“The data supporting the findings of this article is available in the [repository name] at [URL], reference number [reference number].”

Additional Statements on Data Availability

Authors are encouraged to tailor or modify the above statements to align with the specific requirements of their work. In cases where multiple assertions apply, these may be consolidated as necessary.

Case 4: Data Sharing, Documentation of Data Sharing, and Data for Peer Review

In accordance with the journal’s policies, all datasets underpinning the conclusions of the manuscript must be accessible to reviewers and readers. Authors are required to deposit these datasets in publicly available repositories or include them as supplementary materials with their submission prior to peer review. For comprehensive guidelines, please refer to: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html.

Standards of Reporting

Authors are encouraged to adhere to established reporting guidelines relevant to their field, where applicable, to ensure all reporting requirements are met. For guidance, visit Equator (www.equator-network.org) to identify the most suitable reporting standards.

All authors must rigorously comply with the reporting requirements outlined below when preparing their study for publication:

Figures/Tables

Figures/Illustrations (if any)

Authors are required to adhere strictly to the following guidelines when preparing illustrations for submission to the International Journal of Economics and Finance. Manuscripts containing sub-standard figures will be rejected.

High-quality figures must be submitted in PDF, PPT, MS Word, TIFF, or JPEG formats. If necessary, authors are responsible for enhancing the quality of their figures, either independently or through professional graphic designers from their institution or country. Alternatively, authors may utilize the services of PDP, the journal’s recommended service provider, for graphics enhancement.

Guidelines for Figures and Illustrations

Please adhere to the following instructions for submitting illustrations:

  • Illustrations should be embedded within the text file and numbered sequentially based on their appearance. Each figure should contain a single illustration, cropped to minimize excess space.
  • For figures comprising multiple parts, all components must be combined into a single composite illustration file.
  • Photographs should include a scale bar, where applicable, and high-resolution component files must be provided.
  • All numbers, symbols, and letters within figures must be uniform, clear, and sufficiently large to remain legible after resizing for publication.
  • Each figure must be cited in the text in the order of its occurrence.

Scaling/Resolution

Line art images consist primarily of lines and text, without any tonal or shaded areas. The recommended file formats for such images are TIFF or EPS, with the color mode set to monochrome 1-bit or RGB and a resolution between 900 and 1200 dpi.

Halftone images, characterized by continuous tone photographs without text, should preferably be saved in TIFF format, with the colour mode as RGB or grayscale and a resolution of 300 dpi.

Combination images, which incorporate elements of halftone, text, or line art, are best saved in TIFF format with an RGB or grayscale colour mode and a resolution ranging from 500 to 900 dpi.

Formats

Illustrations should be submitted in one of the following formats:

  • Illustrator
  • EPS (recommended for diagrams)
  • PDF (suitable for diagrams)
  • PNG (preferred for photographs or images)
  • Microsoft Word (version 5 or later; figures must be placed on a single page)
  • PowerPoint (figures must be placed on a single page)
  • TIFF
  • JPEG (converted from the original file)
  • BMP
  • CDX (ChemDraw)
  • TGF (ISISDraw)

PDP does not accept figures submitted in GIF format.

For TIFF or EPS figures with substantial file sizes, it is advisable to limit the file size for online submissions. Authors are encouraged to convert their files to JPEG format before submission, as this significantly reduces file size and upload time while maintaining an acceptable quality standard. Although JPEG is a lossy format, saving JPEG files at high or maximum quality is recommended to ensure sufficient image clarity.

The use of compression tools such as Zipit or Stuffit is discouraged, as the compression achieved by these tools is typically negligible.

Authors must avoid submitting the following:

  • Graphics embedded within Word processor documents (e.g., spreadsheets or presentations).
  • Files optimized for screen use, such as GIF, BMP, PICT, and WPG, due to their low resolution.
  • Files with insufficient resolution.
  • Graphics that are excessively large in proportion to their content.


Technical Specifications for Graphics/Figure Submissions

The following technical specifications must be adhered to for figure submissions:

Width: 8.5 inches (within the required range)

Height: 11 inches (within the required range)

Resolution: 300 pixels per inch (minimum dpi)

All figures must be submitted in vector format, except for halftones and photographs.

Image Conversion Tools

Various software packages, many of which are either freeware or shareware, are available for converting between different graphic formats, including PNG. Recommended tools for image conversion include Graphic Converter for Macintosh, Paint Shop Pro for Windows, and ImageMagick, which is accessible on Macintosh, Windows, and UNIX platforms.

Bitmap images, such as screenshots, should not be converted into EPS format, as this often results in a significantly larger file size compared to JPEG, TIFF, PNG, or BMP formats, and a reduction in image quality. EPS format should be reserved for images created using vector-drawing applications like Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw. Most vector-drawing applications can save or export images in EPS format. For images initially created in MS Office applications (such as Word or PowerPoint), the original files should be uploaded directly to the site, rather than being converted to lower-quality formats such as JPEG.

Chemical Structures

Chemical structures should be created using ChemDraw/CDX and submitted as individual files.

Structure Drawing Guidelines

The structure drawing guidelines must adhere to the ACS style sheet, as outlined below:

Drawing Settings
Chain angle120°
Bond spacing18% of the width
Fixed length14.4 pt (0.500cm, 0.2in)
Bold width2.0 pt (0.071cm, 0.0278in)
Line width0.6 pt (0.021cm, 0.0084in)
Margin width1.6 pt (0.096cm)
Hash spacing2.5 pt (0.088cm, 0.0347in)
Text settings
FontTimes New Roman
Size10 pt
Under the Preference
Unitspoints
Tolerances3 pixels
Under Page Setup Use
PaperUS letter
Scale100%

Tables

  • Data tables must be submitted in Microsoft Word table format.
  • Each table should be accompanied by a self-explanatory title or caption, summarizing the content discussed within the table. Detailed legends may follow.
  • The table number, in bold font (g., Table 1), should precede the title, which should be written in lowercase with the first letter capitalized. A period should follow the title.
  • Tables should be placed within the text precisely at the points where they are referenced in the manuscript.
  • Data columns and rows must be clearly distinguishable, with cell borders displayed as black lines.
  • Tables should be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals, based on their citation order within the text.
  • If a reference appears both in the table and the text, a lettered footnote in the table should link it to the numbered reference in the main body of the text.
  • Additional tabular data may be submitted as an Excel spreadsheet.
  • Tables should be used to present data succinctly, minimizing unnecessary repetition and reducing text length.
  • Ensure each table is cited within the text.
  • Any symbols or non-standard abbreviations should be explained at the end of the manuscript.
  • References should be numbered sequentially within the table (using square brackets) and listed in the reference section in the same numerical order.

Authors and Authorship Criteria

Criteria for Authorship

PDP mandates that all individuals listed as authors must have made a significant contribution to the conception, execution, analysis, or dissemination of the research. The determination of authorship is based on the guidelines set forth by ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Authorship Declaration

All authors who have contributed to the work must sign a copyright letter, which includes their full name, affiliation, email address, ORCID ID, and their specific role in the article. Upon successful electronic submission of the manuscript, a system-generated acknowledgement will be sent to each author at the email address provided.

Authors and Institutional Affiliations

Authors must submit a final list of contributors at the time of submission, ensuring that the order of authors’ names is accurate, as no additions, deletions, or rearrangements will be permitted after the manuscript is finalized. The principal author’s email address should be marked with an asterisk. Additionally, the corresponding author’s full address, business telephone number, fax number, and email address must be provided for communication and galley proof purposes. PDP advises all contributors to regularly update their profiles on SCOPUS/ORCID and other relevant databases.

Authors’ Identification

Authors are strongly encouraged to provide their ORCID ID when submitting an article. Alternatively, they may obtain an ORCID ID during the submission process. For further details about ORCID IDs, please refer here.

Authorship and AI Tools

PDP recognizes that authors employ a wide range of tools, from basic to highly advanced, in the preparation of articles related to their scientific research.

In accordance with the guidelines set forth by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), it is stated that “AI tools cannot fulfil the criteria for authorship as they cannot assume responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they are unable to declare the existence or absence of conflicts of interest or manage copyright and licensing agreements.”

The relevance of such tools may shift over time and be influenced by public opinion, prompting considerable debate over the use of AI-driven language tools. While these tools can produce valuable outcomes, they may also result in errors or misleading information. Consequently, it is crucial to disclose which tools were utilized in the evaluation and interpretation of a specific scientific work.

In light of the above, the following requirements must be met:

  • Authors are obligated to disclose any substantial use of tools such as instruments, software, and text-to-text generative AI in their research, ensuring consistency with the subject’s methodological standards.
  • All co-authors must sign a declaration affirming their full responsibility for the content of the work, irrespective of how it was generated. This includes any inappropriate language, plagiarism, bias, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content produced by AI language tools, with all resulting consequences being the joint responsibility of the authors, including co-authors.
  • AI language tools should not be credited as authors. Instead, authors should comply with the stipulation outlined in point (1).

Changes to Authorship

The finalized list of authors arranged in the correct order, must be provided at the time of initial submission and cannot be altered once the publication process has commenced. In exceptional circumstances, requests for the addition or removal of authors may be considered by the publisher, contingent upon a) written consent from all co-authors, and b) a well-founded justification, which may or may not be accepted by the publisher.

Here is some guidance from COPE regarding authorship concerns, which PDP endeavours to adhere to diligently.

General Advice

Advice on how to spot authorship problems

Before Publication

Corresponding author requests addition of extra author before publication

Corresponding author requests removal of the author before publication

After Publication

Request for addition of extra author after publication

Request for removal of author after publication

Non-Author Contributors

Contributions such as securing funding, providing general oversight for a research team, offering administrative support, or assisting with writing, technical editing, language editing, or proofreading, do not meet the criteria for authorship. Individuals involved in these activities may be acknowledged either individually or collectively in the acknowledgement section. Detailed guidance on acknowledgements can be found in the “Guide to Authors.” Those who do not fulfil the requirements for authorship should be recognized in the acknowledgement section instead of being listed as authors.

Guest or Honorary Authorship

All listed authors must make significant contributions to the article and sign the copyright agreement. PDP does not endorse authorship based solely on title or position, such as a research supervisor or department head. The journal adheres to COPE guidelines to address potential cases of ghost, guest, or honorary authorship.

Copy Editing Services

Authors are encouraged to obtain professional assistance to address grammatical, scientific, and typographical errors prior to submitting the revised version of their article for publication.

Authors may utilize the editing services of our designated English language editing partners, email to info@pdpublishers.com

Copy Editing Fees

The article processing charges encompass professional copy-editing services. Once your paper is accepted for publication, you will receive an electronic invoice via email.

Proof Corrections

Page proofs of accepted manuscripts will be provided to authors before publication. To prevent delays, authors must review the proofs for typographical errors and return them within 48 hours. Major revisions are not permitted at this stage.

The corresponding author bears full responsibility for ensuring that the revised manuscript, incorporating all corrections, is approved by all co-authors.

Review Process and Publication Timeliness

All manuscripts submitted to PDP undergo an initial editorial evaluation by the Editorial Staff and the Editor-in-Chief to assess their appropriateness for the journal. The Editor-in-Chief evaluates whether the submission:

  • aligns with the journal’s scope, and
  • satisfies the editorial standards of PDP Publishers in terms of originality and quality.

Manuscripts deemed potentially suitable are forwarded for double-blind peer review, typically involving two impartial and distinguished experts. Renowned international reviewers are invited to assess the manuscript, selected based on the manuscript’s subject matter and the reviewers’ expertise. The identities of both the authors and reviewers remain confidential to ensure anonymity and uphold confidentiality throughout the review process. This anonymity fosters an impartial and unbiased evaluation by the reviewers.

Prior to forwarding manuscripts for peer review, PDP obtains consent from potential reviewers to confirm their availability and willingness to participate. All communications between the journal’s editorial office and the reviewers remain strictly confidential. Reviewers are expected to submit their evaluations promptly, as timely reviews facilitate swift manuscript publication, benefiting both the authors and the broader scientific community.

The editorial process and peer-review workflow are managed by a team of Senior Editors, Editorial Board Members (EBMs), and dedicated Journal Managers, each possessing specialized expertise in their respective fields.

PDP Publishers ensures independent reviews for all submissions, with reviewers selected based on their proficiency from a continually updated referee database.

Based on reviewers’ feedback, the Editors determine whether a manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. Following evaluation by at least two independent experts, alongside input from the Editor, the authors are informed of the decision, which may fall under one of the following categories:

  • Minor revisions required
  • Major revisions required
  • Rejected without the option for resubmission

When an article receives two conflicting reviews, the Editor-in-Chief holds the authority to seek additional comments and may, at their discretion, make the final decision without awaiting further reviews. This decision is made by carefully evaluating the content and conclusions of all submitted reports. Such a proactive measure ensures that decisions are communicated promptly, enabling timely correspondence with the author.

PDP strongly advises against manuscripts being reviewed by experts with potential conflicts of interest with the author(s) of the submission. Since Editors may not be fully aware of all possible conflicts, reviewers are expected to disclose any such conflicts to the Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor if identified during the review process. Additionally, reviewers should inform the Editors or the journal’s editorial office if they have a conflict of interest that could compromise their ability to review the manuscript impartially.

Authors are typically required to resubmit their revised manuscripts within 15 days, after which the revised papers are sent back to the reviewers for further evaluation. Generally, publishers permit a single round of revisions, with a second round allowed only in exceptional circumstances. Should additional revisions be necessary, the manuscript will be rejected, and the author will be advised to resubmit it as a new submission for fresh consideration.

The ultimate decision to accept or reject a manuscript rest with the Editor-in-Chief, based on the quality of the revisions and the overall assessment of the manuscript. In rare instances, manuscripts recommended for publication by reviewers may still be declined during the final evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief.

The revision timeline for any manuscript ranges from one to four weeks, depending on whether the revisions are minor or major. Authors requiring additional time for revisions must seek approval from the Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor, providing valid reasons. If the request is deemed reasonable, the deadline for resubmission may be extended.

Following successful review and acceptance, manuscripts proceed to typesetting, and proofs are sent to authors for final corrections before publication.

Plagiarism Prevention

Plagiarism refers to the act of reproducing or rephrasing another author’s work—whether text, results, or observations—and presenting it as original without proper acknowledgement of the source. Authors are therefore required to credit and cite all referenced works of other researchers in their manuscripts. It is also the author’s responsibility to ensure the authenticity of all sources and the accuracy of the content included in the manuscript.

At PDP, rigorous measures are in place to detect and prevent plagiarism. The organization utilizes Turnitin software to identify textual overlap and similarities in submitted manuscripts. This software compares the content against an extensive database of academic journals, online resources, and other scholarly materials. A similarity report, expressed as a percentage, is generated to indicate the extent of overlap between the manuscript and existing publications. Any flagged similarities undergo a thorough examination in line with the publisher’s Editorial Policies to identify potential instances of plagiarism. The report also provides an overall percentage of reused content for further evaluation.

Credibility of Sources and Acknowledgements

Authors must ensure the originality of their work. Any credible sources referenced in the manuscript must be properly cited. Prior to submission, authors are strongly encouraged to use Turnitin to verify the absence of plagiarism. Additionally, authors must obtain appropriate consent from individuals involved and acknowledge the contributions of co-authors.

PDP implements specific editorial policies for authors with multiple publications. In accordance with these policies, authors must disclose the sources referenced in their recent submissions.

To detect plagiarism, PDP adheres rigorously to COPE guidelines. Authors seeking further clarification may consult the flowcharts available on the COPE website or access them directly by clicking here.

Appeals and Complaints

Editorial decisions are generally final and not subject to reversal. However, authors who believe their manuscript was rejected due to an error or misunderstanding may request clarification regarding the decision. Appeals must present strong reasoning and compelling evidence addressing the criticisms outlined in the rejection letter. Differences in opinion regarding the manuscript’s interest, novelty, or suitability for the journal are not considered valid grounds for appeal. Appeals will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and relevant editors, and the final decision, as determined by the journal manager, will be binding. Even if the journal manager agrees to reassess the manuscript, acceptance is not assured. The reconsideration process may involve the original reviewers, new reviewers, or editors and may require substantial revisions.

For complaints, authors should direct their concerns to the EIC of the respective journal. Complaints to the publisher can be emailed to info@pdpublishers.com

How can a complaint be submitted to PDP Open?

PDP is committed to enhancing its publication practices. Should you have any concerns regarding the handling of your manuscript, kindly provide us with the relevant details by contacting the following email addresses:

For general inquiries, please reach out to: info@pdpublishers.com

For complaints and feedbacks, please contact: info@pdpublishers.com